- Latestly AI
- Posts
- OpenAI vs Anthropic: The Race to Control the Future of LLMs
OpenAI vs Anthropic: The Race to Control the Future of LLMs
Two of the world’s most powerful AI labs—OpenAI and Anthropic—are battling to define the future of large language models. Here’s how they compare.
OpenAI vs Anthropic
The Race to Control the Future of Large Language Models
As AI goes mainstream, two companies are shaping the future more than anyone else: OpenAI and Anthropic.
Both were born from the same place—concern over how AI might be built and used. But they’ve taken very different paths. One powers ChatGPT. The other powers Claude. One is partnered with Microsoft. The other with Amazon and Google.
Here’s how OpenAI and Anthropic stack up in the race for LLM dominance.
Founding Stories
OpenAI
Founded: 2015
Founders: Sam Altman, Elon Musk, Ilya Sutskever, others
Initial Mission: Open, safe AGI for all
Pivotal Moment: Pivoted to “capped-profit” in 2019 and accepted $1B from Microsoft
Flagship Product: ChatGPT (180M+ users, GPT-4)
Anthropic
Founded: 2021
Founders: Dario Amodei, Daniela Amodei (ex-OpenAI)
Reason for Leaving OpenAI: Disagreements over safety, commercial pressure
Funding: $7.3B+ from Amazon, Google, Spark Capital, others
Flagship Product: Claude (Claude 3.5 Opus, Sonnet, Haiku)
Core Products and LLMs
Company | Main Model | Notable Traits |
---|---|---|
OpenAI | GPT-4 / GPT-4o | High performance, integrated with Microsoft, multimodal |
Anthropic | Claude 3.5 Opus | Long context, strong reasoning, aligned for safety |
OpenAI Strengths:
Ecosystem dominance (ChatGPT, API, Azure, Microsoft Copilot)
Best general-purpose performance (GPT-4o)
Ubiquitous integrations (Zapier, Canva, Slack, etc.)
Anthropic Strengths:
Industry-best context window (200K+ tokens)
Trusted by enterprises focused on AI safety
More explainable/transparent architecture (Constitutional AI)
Monetization Strategies
OpenAI
ChatGPT Plus ($20/month)
API usage (token-based)
Enterprise + team plans
Embedded via Microsoft Copilot (Office 365, Teams, Azure)
Anthropic
Claude API (via Amazon Bedrock + their own platform)
Claude Pro ($20/month)
Partner integrations (Slack, Notion AI, etc.)
Enterprise model via Google Cloud + AWS
OpenAI has a broader consumer footprint; Anthropic is winning quietly in enterprise and developer circles.
Key Differences
Category | OpenAI | Anthropic |
---|---|---|
Business Model | B2C + B2B | B2B-first, API-led |
User Base | 180M+ via ChatGPT | No public numbers (millions of API users) |
Partner | Microsoft | Amazon & Google |
Philosophy | Scale-first, product-led | Safety-first, alignment-focused |
Open Source | Closed | Semi-open (Claude API + research papers) |
Multimodal | Yes (GPT-4o) | Early stage (limited image support) |
Recent Milestones
OpenAI
GPT-4o launch (May 2024): Faster, multimodal, real-time
Custom GPTs ecosystem expanding
$2B+ ARR and rising
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Opus released (June 2024): Outperforms GPT-4 in many evals
Raised $7B+ in under 2 years
Claude integrated into Slack, Notion, DuckDuckGo, and more
What’s Next
OpenAI is focused on:
Assistant-style interfaces
Multimodal integration
Dominating every consumer touchpoint via ChatGPT and Copilot
Anthropic is focused on:
Long-context enterprise agents
Trust, safety, and interpretability
Owning the infrastructure behind LLMs (via AWS & Bedrock)
What You Can Learn
Early differentiation (OpenAI = speed; Anthropic = safety) drives long-term positioning
API-first businesses can scale without consumer traffic—if the model quality delivers
Partnerships matter: Microsoft vs Amazon + Google is more than funding—it’s distribution power
You don’t need to be first, just trusted
Join Tens of Thousands Founders, Creators, and Builders
Get the top AI tools, side hustles, and comparisons — in your inbox every Tuesday.
Marco Fazio Editor,
Latestly AI,
Forbes 30 Under 30
We hope you enjoyed this Latestly AI edition.
📧 Got an AI tool for us to review or do you want to collaborate?
Send us a message and let us know!
Was this edition forwarded to you? Sign up here